-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Automatic browser closure #2
Conversation
Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file |
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR implements automatic browser cleanup by adding shutdown hooks to both Playwright and Web infrastructure Apps. The implementation uses the AppDomain.CurrentDomain.ProcessExit event to ensure browser resources are properly disposed of when the application exits. Sequence diagram for automatic browser closure on application exitsequenceDiagram
participant App
participant ServicesCollection
participant WrappedBrowser
participant DisposeBrowserService
participant AppDomain
App->>ServicesCollection: Resolve WrappedBrowser
ServicesCollection-->>App: WrappedBrowser
App->>AppDomain: Add ProcessExit EventHandler
AppDomain-->>App: On ProcessExit
App->>DisposeBrowserService: Dispose WrappedBrowser
DisposeBrowserService-->>App: Complete
App->>App: Dispose App
Updated class diagram for App class with shutdown hookclassDiagram
class App {
+App()
+BrowserService Browser
+TPage GoTo<TPage>()
+void AddShutdownHook()
-void AddShutdownHook()
}
class ServicesCollection {
+static Current
+T Resolve<T>()
}
class WrappedBrowser
class DisposeBrowserService {
+static void Dispose(WrappedBrowser, ServicesCollection)
}
App --> ServicesCollection : uses
App --> WrappedBrowser : resolves
App --> DisposeBrowserService : uses
note for App "AddShutdownHook method added to handle browser disposal on exit"
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information |
Processing PR updates... |
Thanks @2lambda123 for opening this PR! For COLLABORATOR only :
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@2lambda123
Thank you for your contribution to this repository! We appreciate your effort in opening pull request.
Happy coding!
Their most recently public accepted PR is: 2lambda123/actions-stale#36 |
PR Details of @2lambda123 in AutomateThePlanet-BELLATRIX :
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@labels-and-badges[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 52 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes include the addition of a private method named Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Description has been updated! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@2lambda123
Thank you for your contribution to this repository! We appreciate your effort in closing pull request.
Happy coding!
Failed to generate code suggestions for PR |
Your organization has reached the subscribed usage limit. You can upgrade your account by purchasing a subscription at Stripe payment link Disclaimer: This comment was entirely generated using AI. Be aware that the information provided may be incorrect. Current plan usage: 143.19% Have feedback or need help? |
page.Open(); | ||
return page; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The method GoTo<TPage>()
lacks error handling for scenarios where the page cannot be resolved or fails to open. This can lead to unhandled exceptions which may crash the application.
Recommended Solution:
Implement try-catch blocks around the page resolution and opening steps to handle potential exceptions gracefully and provide fallback or error logging mechanisms.
DisposeBrowserService.Dispose(driver, container); | ||
this.Dispose(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The DisposeBrowserService.Dispose(driver, container);
call in the AddShutdownHook()
method does not check if driver
or container
are already disposed or null. This could lead to unnecessary operations or errors during application shutdown.
Recommended Solution:
Add null checks and check if the resources are already disposed before attempting to dispose them again. This will prevent potential null reference exceptions and ensure cleaner resource management.
AddShutdownHook(); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Initializing resources and registering shutdown hooks directly in the constructor can lead to issues with testability and separation of concerns. Consider initializing critical resources like _apiClientService
in a dedicated initialization method rather than the constructor. This approach enhances modularity and makes unit testing easier by allowing more control over the initialization process.
Recommended Change:
public App() { }
public void Initialize() {
_apiClientService = GetNewApiClientService();
AddShutdownHook();
}
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.ProcessExit += new EventHandler((sender, eventArgs) => | ||
{ | ||
DisposeDriverService.Dispose(driver, container); | ||
this.Dispose(); | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using AppDomain.CurrentDomain.ProcessExit
for cleanup tasks is potentially unreliable for applications that can be terminated abruptly, as this event might not always fire. Additionally, resolving IWebDriver
directly in the shutdown hook couples the cleanup logic tightly with the service's availability, which can lead to issues if the service is unavailable at shutdown time.
Recommended Change:
Consider using a more reliable mechanism for cleanup, such as implementing IDisposable
and ensuring that all consumers of the class properly call Dispose
. This change would decouple the shutdown process from the global state and improve the reliability of resource cleanup.
public void Dispose() {
DisposeDriverService.Dispose(driver, ServicesCollection.Current);
base.Dispose();
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @2lambda123 - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider using IAsyncDisposable or a more robust cleanup mechanism instead of ProcessExit event handler, which isn't guaranteed to be called in all termination scenarios (e.g., force kill).
- The disposal pattern needs review - calling both specific disposal methods and this.Dispose() in the event handler could lead to double disposal issues if Dispose() is called explicitly elsewhere.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 3 issues found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
{ | ||
var container = ServicesCollection.Current; | ||
var driver = container.Resolve<WrappedBrowser>(); | ||
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.ProcessExit += new EventHandler((sender, eventArgs) => |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
issue (bug_risk): The ProcessExit event handler is never unregistered, which could lead to memory leaks
Consider storing the EventHandler delegate as a field and removing it in the Dispose method using ProcessExit -=
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.ProcessExit += new EventHandler((sender, eventArgs) => | ||
{ | ||
DisposeBrowserService.Dispose(driver, container); | ||
this.Dispose(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
issue (bug_risk): Calling Dispose in the shutdown hook could lead to double-dispose issues
Consider removing this call since the driver cleanup is already handled, or add a guard against multiple disposes
@@ -216,4 +217,15 @@ private string DetermineTestClassFullNameAttributes() | |||
|
|||
return fullClassName; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
private void AddShutdownHook() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion: Shutdown logic is duplicated across Playwright and Web implementations
Consider extracting the shutdown hook logic into a shared base class or utility to avoid duplication
public abstract class ShutdownHookBase
{
protected void AddShutdownHook()
{
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.ProcessExit += OnProcessExit;
}
protected abstract void OnProcessExit(object sender, EventArgs e);
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Summary by Korbit AI
Code Execution Comments
- Resolve
IWebDriver
correctly during shutdown and add error logging inProcessExit
to capture exceptions.
Files scanned
File Path | Reviewed |
---|---|
src/Bellatrix.Playwright/infrastructure/App.cs | ✅ |
src/Bellatrix.Web/infrastructure/App.cs | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-review
on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-review
command in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-description
command in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolve
command in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.ProcessExit += new EventHandler((sender, eventArgs) => | ||
{ | ||
DisposeBrowserService.Dispose(driver, container); | ||
this.Dispose(); | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add error logging in the ProcessExit event handler.
Tell me more
Consider adding error logging in the ProcessExit event handler. If an exception occurs during the disposal process, it would be beneficial to log it for debugging purposes. You could wrap the disposal calls in a try-catch block and log any exceptions that occur.
private void AddShutdownHook() | ||
{ | ||
var container = ServicesCollection.Current; | ||
var driver = container.Resolve<IWebDriver>(); | ||
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.ProcessExit += new EventHandler((sender, eventArgs) => | ||
{ | ||
DisposeDriverService.Dispose(driver, container); | ||
this.Dispose(); | ||
}); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Resolve IWebDriver within the event handler in AddShutdownHook.
Tell me more
The current implementation of AddShutdownHook resolves the IWebDriver too early. Instead of resolving it when adding the hook, we should resolve it within the event handler to ensure we're disposing of the correct driver instance at shutdown. Consider modifying the method as follows:
private void AddShutdownHook()
{
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.ProcessExit += new EventHandler((sender, eventArgs) =>
{
var container = ServicesCollection.Current;
var driver = container.Resolve<IWebDriver>();
DisposeDriverService.Dispose(driver, container);
this.Dispose();
});
}
This change will ensure that the correct IWebDriver instance is resolved and disposed of when the application is actually shutting down.
Micro-Learning Topic: Cross-site scripting (Detected by phrase)Matched on "XSS"Cross-site scripting vulnerabilities occur when unescaped input is rendered into a page displayed to the user. When HTML or script is included in the input, it will be processed by a user's browser as HTML or script and can alter the appearance of the page or execute malicious scripts in their user context. Try a challenge in Secure Code WarriorHelpful references
|
Description
In this pull request, the following changes are being made:
App.cs
in theBellatrix.Playwright
project andApp.cs
in theBellatrix.Web
project.AddShutdownHook
is added in both files to handle cleanup when the application is about to shut down.AddShutdownHook
method subscribes to theProcessExit
event of the currentAppDomain
to dispose of resources properly before the application exits.Here are the changes in the code:
using Bellatrix.Playwright.Services.Browser;
.App
class constructor, called theAddShutdownHook
method to set up the shutdown hook.AddShutdownHook
method which disposes of browser-related services properly before the application exits. The method resolves the necessary services and subscribes to theProcessExit
event, executing the cleanup logic.WrappedBrowser
) in the Bellatrix.Playwright project or the WebDriver service (IWebDriver
) in the Bellatrix.Web project.Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Add a shutdown hook to automatically dispose of browser services and drivers upon application exit for the Playwright and Web App classes.
Why are these changes being made?
These changes ensure that browser instances are properly closed and resources are freed when the application terminates, preventing potential memory leaks and resource locks. The addition of a shutdown hook is a consistent and automated solution to handle cleanup in an orderly manner without relying on manual interventions.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes